Jesus Was Not A Jew-Appendix and The Curse of Canaan

Appendix A: False Definitions Permit the Rewriting of History


1.) If you look up the word ‘Jew’ as used in the OT, you will see that it always is translated from the Hebrew word, ‘Yehudi.’ This word has only one meaning: Judah. There is no valid reason to translate this word as ‘Jew,’ since it only muddies up the ethnicity of the Judahites. The question remains as to whether any modern Jews can truthfully claim to be descendants of the Tribe or House of Judah.

2.) The descendants of Judah always remained distinct from the neighboring Idumean Canaanites, all the way down to John Hyrcanus, when he permitted circumcision of Edomite males circa 121 BC. John Hyrcanus had effectively merged the separate nations of Idumea and Judah into one nation. This was a violation of Yahweh’s Law, which forbids making covenants with Canaanites.

3.) As a result of this illegal covenant, these same Idumeans moved into Judea and began taking over the religious and political institutions of Judah. This process began their impersonation of Judah. All historians concede that Herod was an Edomite, as the first-century Judaean historian, Josephus – who was NOT a Jew – asserts on at least four occasions, yet this fact is completely glossed over and even concealed by officialdom. Why?

4.) Because the Jews must maintain the pretense that they derive from Judah instead of Edom. To the extent that they admit Edomite intrusion into our bloodline, they teach that the Israelites did this willingly and that Yahweh approves of this arrangement. They also claim that this mixing of bloodlines is of no consequence. The Judeo-Christians make the same argument.

Therefore: Since only true Judahites can be the legitimate descendants of Judah, and since the Sephardic Jews are in fact Edomites from Idumea, the modern-day Jews fudge the definition of ‘Jew’ so that these two unrelated and antagonistic groups will be equated in the minds of modern Christians. This is what I am trying to get you to see. You really need to think about these historical facts, dear Christian. What I am showing you is absolutely critical to the understanding of who or what the Great Deception is!!! The impersonator is pretending to be from Judah. This is a lie. His true origins are not Judahite at all, but Idumean. And, to the extent that we buy into this lie, we are allowing the anti-Christ to have dominion over us.

Jesus was a Judahite, NOT a Jew. The reason why the Jews want the intertestamental period to be flushed down the memory hole is to hide their Edomite origins. At least you are aware of such things. Most Christians are completely in the dark about these matters; and the Jews want desperately to keep these matters quiet. Pretending that Jesus was a “Jew” automatically makes people assume that He was of the same tribe as today’s Jews. But this is exactly the false idea that the Jews want to implant in our minds. Jesus repeatedly rejected kinship with them.

Jesus was neither a Jew by religion nor by ethnicity. The rabbis CLAIM kinship with the Judahites of the Bible, but that is the beginning of their charade as Israel. British Israel has a blind spot in this regard. They give the Jews far too much credit as the kinsmen of Jesus Christ and of the TRUE JUDAHITES of Judea. The Greek word ‘Ioudaios’ means “resident of Judea.” It does not mean “Judahite.” By using the word ‘Jew’ to refer to both concepts, the Jews have successfully blurred the racial and theological enmity that actually existed between these two groups in those days. The Catholic Church did the same thing with Joan of Arc:

In a time when men and the church ruled over Europe, there was one woman who was able to rise above all others and saved her country from the English. She was Joan of Arc. Not only did she fight in battle alongside men, she also claimed that she spoke to St. Margaret, St. Catherine, and St. Michael and they all told her to defend her country and showed her how. The Catholic Church viewed this as a heresy and she was tried and convicted by an ecclesiastical court. She was burned at the stake, like many other “witches” in that day. – Jarred James Broux.

Then, a few hundred years after having burned her at the stake, the Catholic Church had her canonized and rewrote history to portray her as a doctrinaire Catholic as opposed to a French nationalist. Rewriting history fools almost everybody!!!

Appendix B: Comparing British Israelism with Christian Identity

Here is a comparison of where Christian Identity differs from British Israel. The basic difference is that BI believes that either the whole of Jewry or a part of Jewry are actual descendants of the tribe Judah. CI denies this.

BI: Most “Jews” today are Edomites. Edomites are from Esau, the brother of Jacob, and he gave up his birth-right for some soup! This is how he despised his birthright!

CI: We would say that 99.99% of Jews today are either Edomites or Khazars. The occasional pure-blooded Hebrew would go into their ranks only by marriage and/or conversion. An examination of Esau’s marital partners as described in Genesis shows that after he took wives from the accursed Canaanites and saw that this displeased his parents, he then took a wife from the excluded Ishmaelites, further troubling his parents and violating the will of God. If an Israelite intermarries with an Edomite, as Esau did, the offspring of such a union would automatically be a mongrel (Heb. mamzer), a non-Israelite, because the Israelites were forbidden to marry strange flesh. (Deut. 23:2; Neh. 7:63-64, Chapter 10, 13:29; Ezra 2:60-63.)

BI: The Jews are “supposed” to abide by the Old Testament but if they abide by the Talmud, it cancels all the goodness of the OT. This is what Christ calls “Traditions of Men.”

CI: Yes. Very few Christians are able to see through this deception. That Judaism is a religion of lies is something that all Christians must recognize. This is a major part of the Jewish charade. The fact is that Judaism TOTALLY cancels out the goodness of the OT. We see no evidence of any “good Jews” doing the work of the Messiah. Even the “Jews For Jesus” preach that THEIR MESSIAH hasn’t come yet. This is a total denial of Christian principles. But these Jews are not “Judahites gone bad,” as BI teaches. Rather, they are not Judahites at all. That’s why they reject Christ.

BI: The current Jewry wants to hide the truth about the 10 “Lost” Tribes of Israel, and we are to expose this.

CI: Yes, and the Judeo-Christians are equally reluctant to shine light upon the migrations of the Twelve Tribes, because this subject proves our kinship with Christ and All Israel; and it also proves the Jewish cover-up of vital historical facts.

BI: The question of false Judahites, yes it is said clearly in Revelation.

Revelation: 2:9. I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but [are] (Idumeans) the synagogue of Satan.

Rev. 3:9. Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are NOT, but do LIE (Idumeans); behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

CI: The correct translation is “Judeans,” not “Jews.” Since the Greek word ‘Ioudaios’ does not have a racial or religious connotation, but means merely “citizen of a country,” a correct translation will use a word that does not confuse modern meanings with the chronologically correct meaning. The word ‘Jew‘ has many meanings not belonging to either ‘Judah’ or ‘Judean.’ You correctly understand that these false “Jews” are Idumeans. But, even as translated, the reader has here two very important clues that we Christians should be looking for “false Jews”! Who might those people be?

What we in CI are saying is that, by projecting the word ‘Jew‘ back into Old Testament times, we are actually assuming that the Biblical Judahites may have been “Jews” in the modern, corrupted sense. This is where the confusion arises. For this reason, we translate ‘Yehudi‘ as Judahite and ‘Ioudaios‘ as Judean. This avoids the confusion of placing the modern word ‘Jew’ into an illegitimate, anachronistic context. But this is exactly the type of confusion by which the Jews can claim that Jesus was a “Jew,” when we know that He was a Judahite and they were really Idumeans, not Judahites. Do you see why we are so insistent that the word ‘Jew‘ should not be applied to Judahites? The word ‘Jew’ blurs the distinction between the true Judahites and the Idumean Edomites, who were mere residents of Judea but never were part of the tribe of Judah. Today, in their yeshivas, the rabbis spend years coming up with such confusing language and false equations, in order to distort history. They have been cultivating this false equation for the last two thousand years.

The ruse is difficult to decipher because of its sophistication and because of its antiquity – a FALSE antiquity, to be sure! Because so many in BI equate contiguity with consanguinity, they reason that “The rebellious Jews are Judahites gone bad.” Certainly there were some Judahites in Judea, who were taken in by the Pharisees and their impersonation of Judah in the days of Christ. The Pharisaic priesthood had the official sanction of Herod and the Romans, so they were regarded as the religious authorities of the time. After 150 years of usurpation, many Judahites had accepted the Pharisees as the LEGITIMATE priesthood, but this was by deception. It cannot be overly stressed that these Pharisees DID NOT practice the Mosaic Law. They practiced a bastardized version of it, just as the Sepharvaim did, 700 years earlier!!

These two groups of non-Israelite distorters of the Laws of Moses often worked in concert against the House of Judah, especially when Judea was being attacked by the Greeks and then the Romans. Both the Samaritans and the Idumeans were known to help the invaders against the Israelites of Judah and Benjamin. There was commonality between these two nations against Judah; but when the Roman Army destroyed the Temple in 70 AD, they took different paths. As I. Hjelm puts it:

The Samaritans claim continuity with an historical united Israel as Jews do. Their self-understanding is that they derive from the lineage of Joseph, Ephraim and Manasseh and have an unbroken line of high priests with a cultic continuation since the entrance into the promised land. “While Judaism argued for the necessity of a new beginning after the Babylonian exile, Samaritans insisted that the old tradition be maintained. . . . Put very simply, while Jewish tradition maintains the sovereignty of Jerusalem and the Davidic line of kingship, based on the Deuteronomistic and Chronistic histories, Samaritan tradition maintains the sovereignty of Gerizim and its priesthood, on the basis of the authority of Moses and the patriarchs. At the return from the Babylonian exile, neither group would accept a compromise and the split, which, according to Samaritan tradition had begun in the eleventh century, when the priest Eli moved from Shechem to Shiloh to erect a temple and a cult independent of Gerizim, became manifest.”. – Hjelm, “Brothers Fighting Brothers: Jewish and Samaritan Ethnocentrism in Tradition and History,” p. 218-220).

Of course, Mr. Hjelm does not understand that neither the Samaritans nor the Idumeans were true Israelites. They were both pretenders who had merely adopted parts of the Mosaic Law to suit their own purposes.

BI: Rev. 12:9. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. (See also Luke 9:55 and Matthew 25:41.) Rev. 12:9 does not refer to Jews or Idumeans or false Judahites.

CI: Then, to whom does this verse refer? What other entity is deceiving the whole world on such a massive scale? By “false Judahites,” you must mean true Judahites who opposed Christ. Yes, there were many such Judahites, as the book of Acts proves, but these Judahites were the hapless victims of Jewish (Idumean) propaganda. Again, it begs the question of who the deceivers are. And these Judahites DID NOT INVENT Judaism. They were Traditionalist Judahites who wanted to continue practicing the Levitical sacrifices. None of these True Judahites were introducing Pharisaic doctrine into the Mosaic tradition. This was Edomite doing. Question: “Have not the Jews deceived the whole world with their impersonation of Judah and Israel – plus their false equation of the Talmud with the Torah? Is there any greater deception going on in the world today?” Today, this deception is still coming from Jews who pretend to be racial Judahites, which they are not!! If you can demonstrate that SOME OTHER GROUP is deceiving the whole world more profoundly than this, then your objection would have some merit.

BI: Just as the word gay some 80 years ago meant lively as in gay colours, it means something different today. ‘Jews’ in the OT, and possibly in the NT, meant those from the tribe of Judah or if you want to extend it a bit further, those of the House of Judah, which comprises of the Israelite tribes of Judah AND Benjamin.

CI: The word ‘Jew‘ does not belong in the OT. It is an interpolation (false translation). Since the source word in the OT is always ‘Yehudi,’ it can only mean Judah. But, before the days of John Hyrcanus, the tribe of Judah NEVER mixed with Idumeans; and if they did, they would automatically be in violation of Yahweh’s laws against race-mixing. Hence, they would automatically cease to be Judahites and become Jews. In fact, the Israelites were constantly at war with the Idumean Canaanites throughout their history, even up to the time when John Hyrcanus conquered them and offered them citizenship. Hyrcanus never dreamed that these Idumeans would infiltrate and subvert his Kingdom and conquer it from within. This historical infiltration and subversion must be recognized as the KEY FACTOR in determining the difference between Judahites and Jews in those days.

The fact is that the Jews have TRAINED US – that is, they have brainwashed us -to use the word ‘Jew’ as a synonym for ‘Judah,’ which it is NOT! The Judahites of the Olde Testament NEVER referred to themselves as “Jews.” The patriarch and tribe were called Judah, and the individuals were called Judahites, not “Jews.” The word, ‘Jew,’ which is actually a modern contraction for the Greek ‘Ioudaios,’ was not used historically until the 1750’s in England, since we did not have the letter J in our language before then. You must be able to wrap your mind around the concept that the word ‘Jew’ has been promoted as a synonym for Judah. Just because the word exists in current English translations does not mean that it is an accurate term for the Judahites of the Bible. I know that this idea is hard to grasp for people who are so used to using the word Jew for the Judahites of the Bible; but this is usage is deliberately deceptive. And this deliberate deception, this dual usage, is what causes all of the confusion about who is a Jew and who is a True Judahite. This is what I am trying to get you to see. This false equation, Jew = Judah, is precisely the deception that the Pharisaic rabbis use to make you believe that these missed-race Edomites (Jews) are the same people as the (unmixed) Judahites of the Bible! The word Jew demolishes these religious and ethnic distinctions, as is demonstrated by your inability to comprehend what I am saying!!

The question is this: “How can the racially pure Judahites be equated with non-Israelite Edomites?” Answer: “Simple, just call them both by the same name!” Since the Judahites of the Bible NEVER referred to themselves as “Jews,” why do you insist on applying such a vague term to them, when they would reject it as inaccurate? We have to use words which were in use at the time; and the word ‘Jew’ does not qualify. The same thing is true of American Indians, who DO NOT refer to themselves as “Indians.” They call themselves by their various TRIBAL NAMES, not by some word imposed upon them by outsiders! If you referred to the Souix and the Commanches by some made up word, such as “Souixmanches,” do you think either tribe would respect that? Neither would the Judahites accept a word which INCLUDED their enemies, the Edomites, Canaanites and Sepharvaim, as if they were kinsmen!!! The difficulty you are having is that you are unable to accept that the word Jew is a MADE UP WORD. The rabbis have so successfully trained you – and the rest of the world – to accept their terminology that you falsely accept it as BIBLICAL terminology.

This is why knowing the exact history of those days is so crucial to understanding the impersonation. The covenant Hyrcanus made with Idumea was a violation Yahweh’s Law. Ezra and Nehemiah expelled all of the mixed race priests and their wives and children. These events are clearly spelled out in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah, which must be read and understood. The Jews pretend that such mixed marriages were ACCEPTABLE during that Second Temple period. THIS IS A BOLD-FACED LIE!!! Take the time to read these books for yourself, so that you understand what I am saying. When Ezra and Nehemiah restored the Temple, they also forbade mixed marriages. This was to keep the bloodline pure, so that Messiah could be born as a pure-blooded descendant of David and also to have pure-blooded descendants of the House of Judah, such as the Benjamite Apostles, to carry the word of Israel’s redemption to the Dispersed House of Israel in Europe and elsewhere. This is why the gospel of Matthew begins with Christ’s genealogy. It is proof of His racial purity. Luke records His genealogy in Chapter 3 for the same reason.

Contrary to these facts, the rabbis teach that the Judahites began mixing with the Edomites at this time; and this doctrine suits the race-mixers of the Judeo-Christian churches as well. Consequently, by translating the word ‘Yehudi‘ as ‘Jew,‘ a false impression is created in the mind of the reader. The reader thus assumes that today’s Jews are of some kinship with the Judahites of that time. This accomplishes the intended effect of the rabbis: a false identity between Jews and Judahites. The subtlety of this deception makes it hard to grasp. I am doing my best to explain how the clever use of words can distort reality. The false equation between ‘Jew’ and ‘Judah’ allows the rabbis to posture as the descendants of the OT priests and prophets, which they are not. They are Edomites, not Judahites. Do you see why we are so insistent on maintaining these historical distinctions? Without this understanding, there can be no realization that the Jewish people, as a whole, are engaging in cultural and theological IDENTITY THEFT. This is the true meaning of Rev. 2:9, 3:9 and 12:9.

Most people are aware of identity theft by individuals, but few have ever entertained the idea that a whole tribe of people can assume the identity of a completely different tribe! But this is exactly what the Jews have done and are still doing in these last days. The fact is that, in whatever nation the Jews have settled, they have masterfully adopted the customs of the host nation, thus hiding in plain sight, while always failing to assimilate into those nations. Then, they even more masterfully subvert and destroy those nations from within. Invariably, the host nations have discovered the ruse and the treason, which is why the Jews have been expelled from nation after nation, throughout history.

BI: We see that in Matthew 2:1. Now when Jesus had been born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men (druids) to the East to Jerusalem, 2:2 Saying, Where is he that has been BORN King of the Jews? for we saw his “Star” in the East, and are come to worship him.

So the King of the Jews concept referred to the King of the House of Judah (at least). It is not therefore referring to a religion, as Christ Himself does not follow Jewry, which is the religion. This is one way of showing that there is no contradiction between Christ being a Jew, but He still condemns Jewry!

CI: Again, the correct translation is “King of the Judeans.” This is what Pontius Pilate actually instructed to be put on the inscription. This translation puts the phrase in its correct historical context, without having to use a modern word, such as ‘Jew,’ which has a wide variety of meanings; and the meaning, “Judah,” for the word ‘Jew,’ is seen to be questionable at best. Given an accurate account of their dealings with the Israelites and Judahites of the Bible, Jewish heritage is demonstrably post-Old Testament, as are both the Talmud of the Sephardim and the entire Ashkenazi experience. Therefore, there is no possibility that the word ‘Jew’ can be defined to mean “descendants of Judah.” The Jews would have us believe this; and this false belief is the only basis of their claim to Israelite heritage. Also, the Ashkenazi experience is totally unrelated to the Bible, as it is completely non-Shemitic. Are you beginning to see how this word ‘Jew’ is used to trick us into equating the modern, miscegenated Jewish people with the pure-blooded Judahites of the Tribe of Judah? The ruse is difficult to fathom because of its sophistication and because the false equation has long been established, historically. However, many historians have seen through the ruse. As one Bible researcher puts it: “A great majority of the Jews today are Semites only in speech.” – E. Raymond Capt, Missing Links Discovered In Assyrian Tablets, p. 93.

I know you want to redefine ‘Jew’ as pertaining to those Judahites who adopted the newly created religion, called “Judaism,” but it is not that simple. The fact is that Judaism was created by a race of Canaanites and Edomites, who were insinuating themselves into our company. Once you realize that the bulk of the Pharisees is Edomite in origin, this distinction cannot be maintained, because Judaism was not the religion of Judah or Israel. Judaism is just as phony as Jewish ethnic assertions concerning their “Semitic” origins.

The blind spot in BI is due to their willingness to believe Jewish assertions about their past. But these assertions are no more true than any other lie told by the religion of lies. This is the key to the matter: Judaism is a religion of lies; and the lies just keep on coming. The Jews are simply impostors, through and through; and their impersonation of True Israel is the tactical agenda by which the whole world has been deceived. This is the tactic by which the devil poses as a “teacher of Moses.” The Talmudic rabbis make up false doctrine in the name of Moses. That is Judaism, short and sweet.

With this dual deception of phony Shemitic heritage and phony Mosaic religion, today’s rabbis add make-up to the Mask of Moses. The televangelists provide tons of make-up. There’s a reason why it’s called “make-up.” It hides the imperfections. Behind the bleached-blonde hair and the nose job hides an ugly, wart-faced witch. No matter how hard they try, they can’t make Sarah Jessica Parker look or act like Grace Kelly. Gloria Steinem is about the best they can do; and the “leaven” in her genetics is shining through as she gets older. As Paul said, “A little bit of leaven leaveneth the whole lump.” (I Cor. 5:6; Gal. 5:9.) When evil enters into our congregation, it always seeks to destroy us. In Chapter 5 of I Corinthians, Paul admonishes us to cast out of our presence evildoers. As long as BI accepts the company of Jews, it is allowing it itself to be leavened by their duplicity. By falsely assuming that Jews are of Judah, BI gives the devil too much credit…and credibility.

Appendix C: Quotations From Talmudic Jews

In a recent email, commenting on John, a certain Jewess had this to say about John 11:50:

“You know nothing at all; you do not understand that it is expedient for you that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation should not perish.”

Yeshua wasn’t the Messiah, the High Priest Caiaphas knew it, and the Hebrew people don’t think that John nor Caiaphas knew prophecy. The statement below about John is from the New Testament, a book only important to Christians. The Hebrew People do not believe in the New Testament, in fact a book that promotes the idea of a “New” Testament, is really going against God, since God said that the Torah IS ETERNAL.

Therefore, there could never be a “new” Testament, since that would call God a liar, and God is NOT a liar. Also God states that he is NOT a human. This is something that people should understand, but of course human ego would try to make a human into a god, and that is totally against God, and the First commandment.

If your “Jesus” came back today, he wouldn’t go into a “Church” either. In fact he would be horrified to learn that people are worshiping a human as “god”. And he never would believe in any “New” testament. If you think that a Jewish man who wants to be leading his people [would] call his people an “evil” generation, that would be stupid as well. For no “Rabbi” would call his people of the time “evil”, since Jews are not supposed to talk Lashon Harah against an entire community of other Jews. In fact that alone would cause the rest of the people to think the person is not holy. Whoever wrote those type of quotes was not brought up in a Torah abiding culture, which makes me think that Pagans years after “Jesus’” death wrote all those quotes against the Hebrew People to start their own Replacement religion.

The Pagans were jealous of the Hebrew people and that is why throughout history they wanted to kill of the Jews, after all, if God picked a people, the others would resent it.

IT COMES DOWN TO PLAIN JEALOUSY.

The opinion of this Jewess is ludicrous, since she engages in the familiar rabbinical deception of referring to the Talmud as “Torah” and to her race-mixed people as “Hebrews.” We really have to be able to see through such deceptive language! Neither do Christians envy Jews. If anything, even Christian Zionists PITY Jews, because they are concerned that Jewish inability to accept Christ will deprive them of “salvation.” Little do these Christians realize that Jesus does NOT want us to convert them. (Matt. 13:15-18.) The reason why is because they refuse to repent of their crimes. And this Jewess is unrepentant in her denial of Yahshua. One can readily see from her attitude that she has no intention of accepting Jesus Christ or Christianity. It’s time to wake up, folks! It’s time to stop shedding tears for the devil, who only sheds crocodile tears for Christians! She is a rabbinical Jewess; and any Christian who thinks that she can be converted or desires conversion is going against Scripture. At the same time, this Jewess firmly believes in the Talmud, which gives all Jews the right to lie, cheat, rob, rape and even murder us goyim, as the following list of quotations will prove:

Quotations from the Talmud about Non-Jews (also Referred to as Goyim or Cattle)

(Compiled by Rev. Herbert L. Brown, “Seizing the Lord’s Inheritance,” p. 26-28.)

1. “We beg Thee, 0 Lord, inflict Thy wrath on the nations not believing in Thee. Take away, 0 Lord, all hope from them. Destroy all foes of Thy nation.’ -Synagaga Judaica, p. 212. Minhagen, p. 23. Crach Chain, 480 Magah.

2. “The teachings of the Talmud stand above all other laws. They are more important than the laws of Moses.’ — Rabbi Issael, Rabbi Chasbar, et. al.

3. “The decisions of the Talmud are words of the living God. Jehovah Himself asks the opinion of the earthly rabbis when there are difficult affairs in heaven.” — Rabbi Menechen Commentary on Fifth Book-

4. “Jehovah Himself studies the Talmud standing, he has such respect for that book.” — Tract Mechillo.

5. “It is more wicked to question the words of the rabbis than those of the Torah.” — Michna Sanhedryn 11:3.

6. “It is forbidden to disclose the secrets of the law. He who would do it would be as guilty as though he destroyed the whole world.” — Jektat Chadasz, 171, 3.

7. “Every goy who studies the Talmud and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die.’, –Sanhedryn, 59a, aboda Zora 8-6, Szagiga 13.

8. “To communicate anything to a goy about our religious relations would be equal to the killing of all Jews, for if the goyim knew what we teach about them they would kill us openly.” — Libbre David 37.

9. “If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he ought to give only a false explanation. Whoever will violate this order shall be put to death.” — Libbre David 37.

10. “A Jew should and must make a false oath when the goyim asks if our books contain anything against them.”–Szaaloth-Utszabot, The Book of Jore Via 17.

11. “The Jews are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts.” — Saba Mecia 114, 6.

12. “When the Messiah comes every Jew will have 2800 slaves.” — Simeon Haddarsen, fol. 56-D.

13. “Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would not have to be served by beasts. The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and condemned to serve the Jew day and night.” -Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L.

14. “As soon as the King Messiah will declare himself, He will destroy Rome and make a wilderness of it. Thorns and weeds will grow in the Pope’s palace. Then He will start a merciless war on non-Jews and will overpower them. He will slay them in masses, kill their kings and lay waste the whole Roman land. He will say to the Jews: ‘I am the King Messiah for whom you have been waiting. Take the silver and gold from the goyim.’ .. –Josiah 60, 6. Rabbi Abarbanel to Daniel 7, 13.

15. “A Gentile girl who is three years old can be violated.” — ..9boda Sarah 37a.

16. “A Jew may violate but not marry a non-Jewish girl.” — &ad. Shas. 2:2.

17. “A Jew may do to a non-Jewess what he can do. He may treat her as he treats a piece of meat.” –Hadarine, 20, B; Schulchan 9ruch, Choszen Hamiszpat 348.

18. “A Jew may misuse the non-Jewess in her state of unbelief.” — Maimonides, Jak. Chasaka 2:2.

19. “If a goy kills a goy or a Jew he is responsible; but if a Jew kills a goy he is NOT responsible.” –Tosefta. 9boda Za,-a 8, 5.

20. “It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator everywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces.”–Schuichan Qruch, Choszen Hajpiszpat jog

21. “Thou shalt not do injury to thy neighbor (Bible), but it is not said, ‘Thou shalt not do injury to a Goy.’ ” — Mishna Sanhedryn 57.

22. “When you go to war do not go as the First, but as the last, so that you may return as the first. Five things has Kanaan recommended to his sons: ‘Love each other, love the robbery, hate your masters and never tell the truth.‘ ” — Pesachis F. 113B.

23. “A Jew is permitted to rape, cheat and perjure himself; but he must take care that he is not found out, so that Israel may not suffer.” — Schulchan Aruch, Jore Dia.

24. “A Jew may rob a goy – that is, he may cheat him in a bill, if unlikely to be perceived by him.” -Schalchan Arach, Choszen Hamiszpat 348.

25. “If a goy wants a Jew to stand witness against a Jew in a Court of Law, and if the Jew could give fair evidence, he is forbidden to do it; but if a Jew wants a Jew to be a witness in a similar case against a goy, he may do it.” — Schalchan .9ruch, Choszen Hasiszpat 28, Art. 3 and 4.

26. “Those who do not confess the Torah and the Prophets must be killed. Who has the power to kill them, let them kill them openly with the sword. if not, let them use artifices, till they are done away with.” — Schulchan Qruch. Choszon Haviszpat 425.5.

27. “All property of other nations belongs to the Jewish nation, which, consequently, is entitled to seize upon it without any scruples. [As you can see, this is openly happening in Palestine. It is also happening here in America, but Christians refuse to see it. – Eli] An orthodox Jew is not bound to observe principles of morality towards people of other tribes. He may act contrary to morality, if profitable to himself or to Jews in general’ “–Schalchan arach. Choszen Hasisxpat 348.

28. “Should a Jew inform the goyish authorities that another Jew has much money, and the other will suffer a loss through it, he must give him emuneration.”–Schalchan Oruch, Choszen Maipiszpat 388

29. “How to interpret the word ‘robbery.’ A goy is forbidden to steal, rob, or take women slaves, etc., from a goy or from a Jew. But a Jew is NOT forbidden to do all this to a goy.“–Tosefta, Qbda Zara VIRZ, 5.

30. “On the house of the goy one looks as on the fold of cattle.” — Tosefta, Erabin VZZ, 1.

31. “All vows, oaths, promises, engagements, and swearing, which, beginning this very day or reconciliation till the next day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear, and bind ourselves to fulfill, we repent of beforehand; let them be illegalized, acquitted, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant. Our vows shall be no vows, and our oaths no oaths at all.” — Schulchan 9ruch, Edit. 1, 136. (The Jewish Kol Nidre ['All Vows"] Oath has been set to a morbid Jewish music, and is often heard on the radio. it is sung as a chant at each Yom Kippur [Jewish New Year] service [September 17].)

32. “Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings.” — Schulchan Oruch, Orach Chaiw 14, 20, 32, 33, 39. TaIDud Jebamoth 61.

33. “A Jewish mid-wife is not only permitted but she is compelled to help a Jewish mother on Saturday (Jewish Sabbath) and when so doing to do anything which otherwise would desecrate the Saturday. But it is forbidden to help a non-Jewish woman even if it should be possible to help her without desecrating the Saturday, because she is to be considered only as an animal.” — Schulchan gruch, Orach Chaim 330.

34. “At the time of the Cholhamoed the transaction of any kind of business is forbidden. But it is permitted to cheat a goy, because cheating of goyim at any time pleases the Lord.” –Chuichan Qruch, Orach ChaiD 539.

35. “The Jews are strictly Forbidden to cheat their brothers and it is considered cheating already if one sixth of the value has been taken away from him. Whoever has cheated his brother has to return it to him. Naturally all that only holds towards the Jew, to cheat a goy he is permitted and he is not permitted to return to him what he cheated him out of. Because the Bible says: ‘Thou shalt not cheat thy next brother,’ but the non-Jews are not our brethren, but as mentioned above, worse than dogs.” – Aruch Choszen Haniszpat 227.

If Christians had any idea what the Jews REALLY TEACH about Jesus Christ and Christians, there would be a revolution by Sunday. There is no doubt that this type duplicity and animus can only come from Satan himself; and this is why Judaism is the religion of lies and the Synagogue of Satan.

Appendix D: Jewish Duplicity on Intermarriage

In Pseudo-Israel, the Jewish Rabbis Denounce Intermarriage, but in America, the Jews are in the forefront of encouraging White Christians to intermarry with other races. This is just more HYPOCRISY coming from Jewry! While they jealously cling to their religion and culture, by forbidding ASSIMILATION, we White Christians are taught that intermarriage is the solution to the world’s economic and social problems! Why don’t the Jews EVER practice what they preach?


The Curse of Canaan, an Identity Perspective

By Pastor Eli James

Church of the Restoration of True Israel

Introduction

One of the least understood stories of the Old Testament is the story of Canaan and his descendants, the Canaanites. As is commonly the case with the racial and ethnic differences reported in the Bible, modern commentators tend to gloss over these differences as if they did/do not matter. But these differences absolutely mattered to Yahweh, our Father, and to Canaan ’s kinsmen, those of the nations of Ham, Shem and Japheth. And it matters to us, the Israelite descendants of the House of Jacob. Even the most universalistic interpreters of Scripture concede that the God of the Old Testament, Yahweh, was a jealous God, one who had a particular interest in a peculiar people, Israel .

From this perspective, the Bible must be understood as the spiritual, physical, and moral history of the Adamic Israelites and their descendants. (Gen. 5:1.) But it is just as important to understand the history of Adamic Israel’s enemies. The false religion of Judeo-Christianity either negates or ignores the subject of Israel’s enemies. Worse than this, the Judeo-Christians have fallen for Satan’s deceptions and actually believe that the Jews are the Israelites of the Bible – this, in spite of the fact that the Jews are well known to be of non-Shemitic stock: of primarily Khazar-Ashkenazi genetics and Edomite-Sephardic genetics. In other words, today’s Jews are, in fact, CANAANITES, not Israelites.

In order to overcome or deny the racial separatism taught in the Old Testament, modern scholars and theologians, under Jewish direction, have devised a theology of their own, called “Dispensationalism.” This theology teaches two doctrines that cannot be found in the Bible: 1.) the Jews were or are g-d’s chosen people and 2.) these “chosen” people, because of their failure to accept Jesus Christ as the Messiah, were replaced by the “Church”.

This false theology has done incredible harm to understanding Scripture. Contrary to this false dichotomy, the Old Testament teaches that there are two main groups of people: Israelites and Canaanites, and that these two groups were to be perpetually at war with each other until the Judgment Day. (Gen. 3:15.) These Canaanites are still with us today, but they are hiding their true identity under an assumed name. (Ezek. 35:5, 36:5.) Can you guess what name these Canaanites have assumed? They have named their perpetual warfare state after their enemies, whom they are impersonating. The Judeo-Christian world is simply too deluded by its own theology to see reality, which is that the Zionist State is the rebirth of Babylon, under the direction of the Edomites and Canaanites of the Old Testament, who are today known as Jews.

Until you understand that the so-called State of “ Israel ” is actually a nation of Canaanites, you will not understand the Bible.

Who Was Canaan?

Genesis, Chapter 9 tells of the episode of Noah’s drunkenness. Verse 22 states, “And Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father, and told his two brethren without.” The two brothers went into the tent, carrying a blanket and walking backwards, so that they would not see the nakedness of their father also.

Verses 24 – 26: “And Noah awoke from his wine, AND KNEW WHAT HIS YOUNGER SON HAD DONE TO HIM, and he said ‘Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be to his brethren.’ And he said, ‘Blessed be Yahweh Elohim of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.”

There is a lot more contained in these three verses than most Bible scholars care to admit. Let’s take a closer look.

First of all, why would Noah curse Ham’s son, Canaan , for something that Ham had done? All we are told is that Ham “saw the nakedness of his father.” Secondly, Verse 24 gives the impression that this curse took place immediately after he awoke from his drunkenness. But this is illogical. Why would Noah curse his grandson ( Canaan was Ham’s son), who had to have been born much later, for something done by Ham? I think there was a period of about nine months between the “nakedness” and the “curse.” This story has caused much confusion among Bible scholars, even causing some to speculate that it was Canaan who was the “offender,” not Ham. Concerning this drunkenness episode, the entry in the Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible goes so far as to say that this event never actually happened; rather, it is a mythological story about the discovery or invention of wine! (Vol. III, p. 555.) I laughed out loud when I read this nonsense. I kid you not! That’s what the Interpreter’s Dictionary actually says!! As usual, the orthodox scholars have it wrong. The Bible clearly says that it was Ham who saw the “nakedness of his father.” Is there more to this expression than meets the eye? When in doubt, check the idioms.

Leviticus 18, verses 6 through 18, covers the subject of incest. Of particular interest is verse 7, which says this: “You shall not uncover the nakedness of your father, which is the nakedness of your mother.”

Here, we have a direct correspondence between the nakedness of the father and the nakedness of the mother. We have to realize that in the early days of national Israel , the wife was considered to be the property of the husband. (Ah! The good old days! Sigh!) Indeed, it is still so in much of the world today. It is only in the Christian West where women have been granted voting rights and equal access to education. Elsewhere, women are still considered to be the property and playthings of men. Idiomatically, since the wife belonged to the husband, her nakedness was his nakedness as well, because she belonged to him, and no one else was allowed to uncover it. In those days, the only reason an Adamite woman would have to uncover herself was for a bath, elimination or sex. We must also consider the fact that this cannot be just an episode of voyeurism, because the guilty party would have been Ham, not Canaan . We have to come up with a good reason for why it was Canaan , not Ham, who was cursed.

Some critics of the Bible have suggested that this episode means that Ham had had a homosexual relationship with his Father, Noah; but that is out of the question. In their zeal to disrespect or scoff at the Bible, they forget that homosexual encounters do not produce offspring! The fact is that it was Canaan who was cursed, not Ham. Ham would have not just been cursed, he would have been executed on the spot had he raped his father!!! Besides, Noah was a law-abiding man, and homosexuality was/is not tolerated by Yahweh’s Law. (Leviticus 18:22.)

An article from www.leithart.com, entitled “Noah’s Nakedness,” has this to say about this episode:

“1.) The language of ‘uncover nakedness’ is not used in Leviticus to describe homosexual incest but hetereosexual incest. 2.) Specifically, the ‘nakedness of the father’ is identified with the ‘nakedness of the mother.’ 3.) If this is about Ham’s incestuous sex with his mother, the emphasis on Canaan comes clear. Canaan is, on this interpretation, the product of the incestuous union, as Moab and Ammon are the product of Lot and his daughters. That is why Canaan is cursed, and why the text consistently identifies Ham as the ‘father of Canaan.’…4.) The maternal incest interpretation better shows the connections of Gen. 9 with Gen. 6, 19, Lev. 18 and 20.”

Bob Enyart, in an article entitled “Why Was Canaan Cursed?” has this to say about Biblical idioms:

“As all authors and peoples do, Moses and the Jews [Sic. Israelites] used figures of speech. Some of the Bible’s figures of speech are euphemisms that promote modesty. For example, instead of saying that Adam had sexual intercourse with Eve, the Bible more politely says that ‘Adam knew his wife Eve, and she conceived’…The reader who misses these common figures of speech will misunderstand the plain meaning of various passages.”

He then goes on to quote Leviticus, 20:11 , which states:

“The man who lies with his father’s wife has uncovered his father’s nakedness.”

Although, it is not hinted in the Bible, some scholars think that the story is about Ham trying to assume authority over Noah, by sleeping with his mother. If that is true, then I think Noah would have highly resented this, and probably would have cursed Ham as well. The account is too brief to say much more, except that it is possible that Ham was just as drunk as Noah and his wife. Could Ham have been so drunk that he mistook his mother for another? Stranger things have happened!! — not in MY family! I hope!!

Suffice it to say that Leviticus 18:7 and 20:11 give us sufficient cause to suspect a case of incest, and that is why it is Canaan , not Ham, who is cursed. Canaan would have been the innocent victim of such an act; and since the law does not allow innocents to be killed, Canaan lived on and started a family of his own. The next question is: What kind of family?

The Canaanites As a People

The full curse of Canaan (Gen. 9:25-27) says this: “And he said, ‘Cursed be Canaan; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren.’ And he said, ‘Blessed be Yahweh Elohim of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant.’ God shall enlarge Japheth, and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem and Canaan shall be his servant.”

The immediate suggestion is that Canaan , for some important reason, would not or could not aspire to the greatness of his brethren. If he was indeed the product of incest, he could not be a patriarch of the Holy Seed. For the same reason, Ammon and Moab , the sons of Lot by incest (Gen. 19:32), could not be patriarchal leaders either. Therefore, these three males, Ammon , Moab and Canaan , although genetically Adamic Israelites, could not assume the role of patriarch or priest. This was out of the question, according to Yahweh’s Law. (By the way, Judaism permits incest, and this is just more proof that Judaism is NOT Mosaism. “Pederasty with a child below nine years of age is not deemed as pederasty ” Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 54b) Therefore, if Canaan had ambitions to leadership, he would have to go elsewhere to get the respect and obeisance he could not get from his own people.

Another consideration of incest is the fact that children born of incest often have dramatic birth defects. Probably the most famous case of incest was that of Tolouse Lautrec, the French painter. His lower body was terribly deformed, his legs practically useless. Despite his talent as a painter, his low self-esteem, due to his deformity, led him into a life of degeneracy. He not only painted portraits of Parisian whores, he utilized their services and died of syphilis at the age of 37. (Most of his biographers omit the fact that his parents were “kissin’cousins” who should not have gone beyond the kissing stage in their relationship!!!!! He did indeed fall and break his legs at age twelve, but this was due to his already deformed legs.)

Canaan Leaves His Brethren

Genesis, Chapter 10 gives us the details of Noah’s descendants. Verse 6 gives us the names of the sons of Ham: “Cush and Mizraim, and Phut and Canaan .” From these sons, great nations, such as Egypt , Ethiopia , Assyria and Babylon emerged. But Canaan was a special case. On him was placed a curse. The nature of this curse must be thoroughly examined in order to appreciate who the Canaanites were and are.

Verses 15-19 give us the descendants of Canaan . Note the names very carefully: Sidon (the father of the Sidonians); Heth (the father of the Hittites). These two tribes are directly descended from Canaan himself. The other tribes are the Jebusites, the Amorites, the Girgasites, Hivites, Arkites, Sinites, Arvadites, Zemarites and Hamathites. We are also told that the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were within Canaanite territory. The first six clans or tribes were later to become the bitter enemies of Jacob/Israel. Why? What was the reason for the animosity between Canaan ’s descendants and the Shemitic Hebrew Israelites?

Note, first of all, that these Canaanites are not descendants of Shem. Rather, they came through Ham, Shem’s brother. The Canaanites are NOT Shemites. They began as Hamites. The question is, were they pure Hamites or did they miscegenate with the Kenites and other non-Adamites of Gen. 15:18-21?

Bob Enyart, in his article quoted above, summarizes the situation:

“Genesis Nine records that Ham saw Noah’s nakedness, and as a result, cursed his grandson Canaan. Then Canaan went on to become the patriarch of Israel’s long-standing enemies, the Canaanites. The story seems capricious on the surface, in contrast to so much reasonable history in Genesis. A common biblical figure of speech appears in Canaan’s story, and when Christians reread the story understanding this figure, the message of this account becomes compelling…Canaan lived a cursed life because he was conceived by a perverse union. Thus the brief story twice reminds its ancient readers that Ham (not Noah) is the father of Canaan. So Noah cursed Canaan not as an evil spell or hex, but as a warning to others against following in Ham’s wicked ways. And readers of Genesis find a clear and reasonable origin for the conflict that lasted for centuries between the Jews [sic. Israelites] and the Canaanites.”

Of course, Judeo-Christian scholars do not consider Canaan ’s later, even greater sin, that of race-mixing with the Kenites, thus starting his own clan, the clan of Canaanites. There can be no doubt that Canaan left his own people and fathered a Cainite [Kenite = “descendant of Cain”] tribe.

Even though the Canaanites bear the name of a Hamite, they are, in fact KENITES, because Canaan simply married into their house. Canaan forsook the clan of Ham and joined the serpent seed in the land that bears his name, Canaan . It is, therefore, more correct to say that the Canaanites are Cainites who assumed the name of Canaan , perhaps as a bragging point to claim Noah as their ancestor. Canaan was an Adamite, but he became a race-traitor. The same thing happened to Jacob’s twin brother, Esau, who actually married two Hittite women, but that is a subject for another essay.

The Seedlines Documented

The seedline of Yahshua Messiah is given in Luke, Chapter 3. It clearly shows that Jesus was an Adamite through Noah and Shem. Neither Cain nor Canaan are in that line of descent because neither fathered Adamite children. The Bible is very clear: In order for a child to be considered an Adamite, BOTH PARENTS must be Adamites. No half-breeds are allowed in the congregation of Yahweh (Deut. 23:2).

In brief, the genealogy of Cain and Canaan goes like this: Nachash (who seduced Eve): Cain: the Kenites: the Canaanites: the Edomites: the Idumeans (from whom the scribes and Pharisees originated), and finally: the Jews. All of these people carry in their blood the genetic material of Nachash, a fallen angel. The Book of Enoch says that Eve was seduced by one of Satan’s lieutenants. His name was Gadrel. If that account is correct, then the Serpent had a name, Gadrel.

Noah’s prophecy that Canaan ’s descendants will be the servants of the Shemites was proven accurate when the Canaanites and Edomites, after having been subdued militarily by Joshua and David, were hired as servants to the House of David. And throughout history, Israelite Kings and Queens have hired Jews as economic advisers, lawyers, consultants, astrologers, etc. Indeed, throughout history, Canaan has been the servant of Shem…until very recently.

One extremely significant prophecy is completely overlooked by mainstream Judeo-Christians. After Jacob was blessed by his father, Isaac, Esau, the prototypical whining Jew that he was, came crying to his father, weeping and begging for a blessing. Gen. 27: 30-46:

30And it came to pass, as soon as Isaac had made an end of blessing Jacob, and Jacob was yet scarce gone out from the presence of Isaac his father, that Esau his brother came in from his hunting. 31And he also had made savoury meat, and brought it unto his father, and said unto his father, Let my father arise, and eat of his son’s venison, that thy soul may bless me. 32And Isaac his father said unto him, Who art thou? And he said, I am thy son, thy firstborn Esau. 33And Isaac trembled very exceedingly, and said, Who? where is he that hath taken venison, and brought it me, and I have eaten of all before thou camest, and have blessed him? yea, and he shall be blessed. 34And when Esau heard the words of his father, he cried with a great and exceeding bitter cry, and said unto his father, Bless me, even me also, O my father. 35And he said, Thy brother came with subtilty, and hath taken away thy blessing. 36And he said, Is not he rightly named Jacob? for he hath supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright; and, behold, now he hath taken away my blessing. And he said, Hast thou not reserved a blessing for me? 37And Isaac answered and said unto Esau, Behold, I have made him thy lord, and all his brethren have I given to him for servants; and with corn and wine have I sustained him: and what shall I do now unto thee, my son? \ 38And Esau said unto his father, Hast thou but one blessing, my father? bless me, even me also, O my father. And Esau lifted up his voice, and wept. 39And Isaac his father answered and said unto him, Behold, thy dwelling shall be away from [the words, “AWAY FROM,” in the Revised Standard Version, but not in the KJV] the fatness of the earth, and of the dew of heaven from above; 40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.

These words are a continuation of the curses upon Cain, for whom the ground would not yield its fruit, and upon Canaan , who was cursed by Noah. Note that these curses fall upon the same seedline: Cain: Canaan: Esau, who was renamed Edom. It is well known to all that the Jewish people don’t know the first thing about farming, and their Talmud says that farming is the lowliest position that any Jew can occupy. (Yebamoth 63a.)

Note further that Isaac said that Esau’s descendants would live by the sword. Indeed they have. For these Edomites and Canaanites have made continuous war against True Israel ever since. In modern times, these descendants of Esau have made continuous war against the House of Jacob; but they have been able to disguise their militarism by using the power of usury to finance mercenary armies. And this is the story of the House of Rothschild, which has made continuous war against the House of True Israel, since they financed the French Revolution in 1789. Since then, these Edomites, although serving the royal Houses of True Israel in Europe , have been plotting and scheming against our people ever since.

Isaac’s prophecy was fully realized in the year 1948, when these Edomite Jews created the bastard State of Israeli , and they have had the dominion over us since that day!!!

40 And by thy sword shalt thou live, and shalt serve thy brother; and it shall come to pass when thou shalt have the dominion, that thou shalt break his yoke from off thy neck.

Since only we in Identity understand that the Jews are impostors, posing as Israel , no one else can figure this prophecy out. Zionism and the Israeli State are the complete fulfillment of Isaac’s prophecy to Esau. The Judeo-Christian world, utterly fooled and deluded by Judaism’s false claims to Israelite heritage, literally worship the anti-Christ in the name of the Bible. And this also fulfills the New Testament prophecy that whole world would be deceived the Zionist beast (Rev. 12:9).

The Satanic empire of Zionism was established in the State of “ Israel ” on May 15, 1948 . Since that day, the tables have been turned, and Esau has had the domino over Jacob-Israel; but that is only a temporary development. The Judgment Day will put an end to Esau’s dominion; and the Canaanites will be written out of the Book of Life forever (Zech 14:21 , Rev. 20).

Conclusion

The pulpit wolves insist that Yahweh’s prohibitions against race-mixing have either been abandoned or were never to be taken seriously. But the entire Bible is about one people, Adamic Israel, remaining racially pure and true to Him. Since the Jewish people are the most mongrelized people on the face of this earth, it is perfectly understandable that their priesthood is behind the promotion of the integration/destruction of the White Race. They know that if they can race-mix True Israel out of existence, then Yahweh’s Plan to dethrone, through Adam, the dominion of the Fallen Angels here on earth will have been defeated. We can’t let the Jewish-Zionist genocidal war against the White Race succeed. We must re-awaken the racial consciousness of our people, Israel .

The evil genius of this counter-plan by Satan can only be comprehended when we realize that the Jews have been impersonating True Israel, so that they can proclaim themselves to be experts on the interpretation of the Bible; and the sheeple of Judeo-Christianity have been slavishly following this false gospel, since the Jews started promoting it through their false priests, the televangelists, the Dispensationalists, the Evangelicals, and other priests-for-hire, who are nothing other than modern day race-traitors, just like Canaan and Esau. Even the Catholic Church promotes race-mixing today, thanks to the Jewish takeover of the Papacy in 1963, under the auspices of the Freemason, John XXIII. These false priests are the very “wolves in sheep’s clothing,” whom Yahshua warned us about.

The sheeple of Judeo-Christianity have been deceived by the false teachings of the “Christian” Zionists, who are nothing but Satan’s ministers, deceiving the whole world with their distortions of God’s Holy word, the Bible. These gullible sheeple have become Jesus Christ’s worst enemies; and they understand it not!!! They have been utterly bamboozled by the Jewish version of the “gospel,” which is “salvation by race-mixing.” Everywhere you go, these wretchedly gullible sheeple believe that race-mixing is acceptable and that all of the world’s problems will be solved when the White Race no longer exists. Since the French Revolution, the Rothschilds and other Jewish banking families have financed war and revolution using the Illuminati, Freemasonry, Communism, Zionism, and the United Nations.

Satan’s children, the Jews, who are the descendants of Cain, Canaan , and Esau, are doing a delicious job of continuing the legacy of their forefathers and their ultimate father, Satan himself (John 8:44 ), in trying to destroy True Israel. Indeed, the Curse of Canaan is still with us. It is called Judaism; and its bastard child is “Judeo-Christianity.”

By assuming the name of Israel, these descendants of the Canaanites, the Jewish people, have fooled generations of scholars, who are paid to make babble out of what is really very simple: the Blood Feud between Adam/Israel and the Canaanite Jews, predicted at Genesis 3:15. True Christianity has been hijacked by Satan’s disciples, who call themselves “Christians.” Fortunately, we in Identity know that this deception has only a few more years left, before their Empire of Deceit is overthrown by the Second Coming of Jesus Christ.

As for me, I can only say, “Come quickly, Lord Jesus.”

They won’t teach you this in Sunday school.

Yah bless,

Pastor Eli James

Source